The concept of change of government was afforded to the voters of Jackson two times. Both times the proposal was defeated at the polls. I think, basically, the people in Jackson don’t want a change of government. They want a change of administration. If it’s broke (government), fix it. If it’s not, let it be. I have been a property taxpayer in Jackson since 1950, so you know I have been around the block a few times.
Since it’s been stated that the position of mayor is largely a ceremonial position, I think it’s an insult to all the past mayors. I would have been honored to have been a mayor in this fine township. Our present system of government works.
In principle, I would like to have a mayor directly elected by the voters of Jackson, but to have a "non-partisan" election is something I don’t agree with. There will always be influence of either Repub-licans, Democrats or independents in any form of government. If you believe a non-partisan government works, get in touch with me — I have a bridge I would like to sell to you.
Elections in general are a bother to a great many voters. You have elections in April for school board, May for primary, fire department, and now a group wants a May election for a non-partisan government. Most, if not all, elections should be held in November to get a better voter turnout. I wouldn’t want to have a mayor elected for four years. Two years would be maximum. Why get stuck with a possible incompetent mayor for four years?
Some residents are confused as to the petition that is being circulated. To vote directly for a mayor is not a bad idea, but the signers must be told all about the ramifications: non-partisan government, voting in May, the extra cost in payroll, the cost of changing the present official books, etc. Remember, a half-truth is a lie.
I also believe any form of government should have a spending cap. To spend money above the cap, the taxpayers should be able to say yes or no.
To give an example: The Township Committee wants to borrow money in order to lower our municipal taxes, instead of using the surplus money. This proposal would be presented to the voters of Jackson.
I’m more than sure that the voters would vote this proposal down in a heartbeat. The loan would have to be repaid with interest. It’s supposed to be "govern-ment of the people, by the people, for the people" and "government shall be governed by the governed," or is this something you only learn in school?
Could it be "government of the politicians, by the politicians, for the politicians, governing themselves?"
There are many forms of governments that can be used in townships. A five-member committee with one of the candidates to be elected for mayor by the voters of the municipality might work out better than what we now have.
Let’s not be too hasty in changing our present form of government.
Sal Duscio
Jackson