New ordinance restricts families’ enjoyment with dogs

Dog-loving residents of Manalapan have every right to be upset with the new Ordinance No. 2004-14 that defines electronic fences and states that no person owning, keeping or harboring any dog shall suffer to permit it to run at large outside the premises of the owner unless 1. The dog is restrained by a fence, enclosure or leash or 2. an electronic fence has been installed on the property and an individual at least 12 years of age is present at all times.

The ordinance further states that electronic fences are prohibited in the front yards of any property unless they were installed prior to Sept. 1, 2004.

This ordinance punishes many responsible dog owners who rely on electronic fences or voice command to keep their dogs from running loose.

Conscientious owners of well-trained dogs should have the right to keep and enjoy their animals on their own property. It discriminates against the dog owner and will unfairly target large dog breeds that need lots of exercise for good health and happiness.

The ordinance strips the property owner of their right to provide a safe environment for their dog and is unenforceable.

Enforcement of the ordinance will be discretionary and enforced inconsistently. It will cost taxpayers more tax dollars (enforcement and administrative costs) and not necessarily provide the safety benefits intended. And it will fuel neighborhood feuds.

Here’s a suggestion — set up a quality of life hotline number so that residents may call anonymously and lodge a quality of life complaint.

Public education program(s) re: teaching safety around dogs, cats, etc.; respect for other’s (neighbor’s) property; respect for animals and preventing abuse; and responsible dog ownership must be incorporated in the township training agendas.

It is unfair that those of us who have dogs have no place in our town where we can spend a leisurely walk or afternoon with our dog and family. We are not allowed to take our dog to any of the Manalapan park areas which in itself discriminates against all dog owners in the township. Now we are restricted on our own private property. We are currently forced to go to adjacent towns to enjoy an outdoor experience with our dog. The creation of an off-leash area for dogs and their owners must be considered and implemented now.

Barbara Hallas

Manalapan