No excuse for delay in birth record access bill

For almost 30 years, advocates have tried to get a bill passed in New Jersey that would permit adult adopted persons access to a copy of their own original birth certificate.

Bills have passed in the Assembly in 1991 and 1994, and in the Senate in 2004, 2006 and in March 2008. (A bill has a twoyear life, but you probably know that!) The Senate bill, S611, passed by a 31-7 margin. There are 23 sponsors on the companion bill, A752, and several others have pledged to sign on. (For details about the bill, go to www.njleg.state.nj.us/ and type in the bill number.)

We believe that attempts to broker a compromise have failed because the Catholic Conference of Bishops controls Speaker Roberts. He is the single force that is stopping the bill from being heard in the Assembly Human Services Committee. For the past three legislative sessions, we have had the votes for the bill to pass not only in committee, but also on the floor, yet he will not let it be heard, and he won’t say why. What is there to fear?

Other opponents include the New Jersey Bar Association, New Jersey Right-to-Life, the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (ACLU-NJ) and the National Council for Adoption, a Washington-based organization. Note that many of the opposition make their living through adoption, while those advocating for adoptee rights, live adoption.

What’s behind the opposition you may ask? They claim that birth mothers were promised confidentiality, yet no one can produce a document backing that up. When the state Bar Association was asked at a hearing a few years ago to show where confidentiality was promised in the law, they finally admitted that it was not, but said it was implied because records were sealed.

In fact, the New Jersey bill that sealed records in 1940 stated it was “to protect adoptive parents from the birth parents coming back and possibly causing harm or embarrassment.”

Right To Life claims that abortions will increase yet statistics prove otherwise. And the ACLU says they will not support access because of “competing interests.”

We have so much data to show that the oppositions’ claims are unfounded and that providing adoptees with access to their heritage and possibly updated family medical information is not only healthy for adoptees, but for birth parents as well.

For more information, go to www.njcare. org or contact me at jfoster7@optonline. net if you are interested in pursuing this subject further.

Judy Foster

Randolph

New Jersey Coalition for Adoption Reform & Education (NJCARE) member

American Adoption Congress New Jersey State Representative