I, like most residents of Manville, have become concerned about the recent increase of graffiti within our town.
The most shocking incident was the 33 building painting spree that took place over the weekend. It was very good news to hear that the three young perpetrators of this incident were discovered and arrested.
Now, I don’t know these young men, but their actions give the impression that they have little or no respect for other peoples’ property, their community or even themselves. While disturbing, I find the lack of respect our town council has for its residents, with the exception of Mr. Szabo, even more disturbing.
The ordinance they seek to pass forcing property owners to remove the graffiti within 90 days or face a financial penalty is, in my opinion, reprehensible.
While I’m sure the ordinance is well intended, its execution is sorely lacking. These people have been the victims of a crime and it appears as if our local government looks to victimize them even further. These are difficult financial times, and I’m sure the removal of this vandalism could prove costly.
For some, this process could very well be beyond their financial means.
And yet Manville seeks to make what could be a bad situation for these property owners even worse. I understand the need to remove the graffiti in a timely fashion. And I believe that property owners want to remove the graffiti (I certainly wouldn’t want it on my property), but for the town to force it upon its residents under threat is simply unjust.
Ideally, as Mr. Szabo suggests, the culprits should be held accountable and made to pay for the removal. Perhaps it should go further, having them directly participate in said removal as part of a community service.
It could prove humbling for the boys, having to face their victims as they repair the damage they have caused.
In instances where no one is apprehended, I strongly feel that no financial penalty should be levied. In fact, I think that rather than threaten property owners, the town should offer incentives to promote a speedy clean-up. Perhaps the town should offer to help cover some of the cost up to a certain dollar amount.
Better yet, offer a credit to the property owner’s tax bill — I believe this would be a much more respectful way of handling the situation.
Then again, our town may not be able to afford such incentives. If that is the case, they shouldn’t expect our residents to be able to afford it either.
Remember: these property owners are victims, not criminals. Treat them as such.
Gress Street

